Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Pandey, V.
- Forestry Internet Information Resources
Abstract Views :297 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Source
Indian Forester, Vol 137, No 1 (2011), Pagination: 29-46Abstract
Forests are one of the biggest gifts of nature and one of the most valuable resources for future human existence in sustainable way. Forestry has emerged as a subject for study; a lot of work is going on all over the globe hence it is need of the time for scientists, researchers, administrators, and policy makers etc to keep themselves informed and be knowledgeable. The Internet has re-modified the information environment, scientific communications are changing at a very fast pace, and the style of information exchange are also changing. Large amount of voluminous data and meaningful information on an almost all aspects of forestry and allied sciences are available on the Internet and can be searched round the clock. To reap the benefit of information it should be readily available, accurate, in-time, omnipresent and should also be cost-effective. In recent decades, the intensive development of Internet has taken place due to fast technological developments. Internet has emerged as a sole leading information provider. In past few years an uncountable amount of research & policy papers by different and diversified group authors devoted to forestry and allied sciences are available on the Internet, apart from this information related to various organizations, institutes, research establishments, colleges societies are also available on internet. All available information on the Internet is accessible to users with valid internet connection at all times. Voluminous information is available on the internet to meet specific purposes. Information from primary, secondary and tertiary sources are also available. The information is available in various forms and formats. The most preferred format of information retrieval is PDF apart from it other available forms are DOC, JPEG, PPT etc. The information on internet can be remotely accessed and retrieved by directly browsing the concerned website or through various repositories or libraries. It is very difficult for a person to remember addresses of a range of websites at an instance. This work is an attempt to categories forestry into various sections and to consolidate the websites available in each section. The informative sites are further systematized. This appraisal gives an analysis of some forestry web resources. An extended list of web links is given in Tabular form. The paper summarizes selected forests and forestry related internet information resources.Keywords
Internet, Information, Resource, Websites and Forestry
- A Prospective Study of Adverse Drug Reactions Monitoring in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Rewa (MP)
Abstract Views :230 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Pharmacology, S.S. Medical College, Rewa, (MP), IN
2 Department of Medicine, S.S. Medical College, Rewa, (MP), IN
1 Department of Pharmacology, S.S. Medical College, Rewa, (MP), IN
2 Department of Medicine, S.S. Medical College, Rewa, (MP), IN
Source
The Indian Practitioner, Vol 69, No 11 (2016), Pagination: 11-15Abstract
Aims and Objectives: The aim of study is to determine the pattern of suspected ADRs reported in ICU and ward admitted patients in a tertiary care hospital.
Material and methods: Study was conducted in the department of Pharmacology and department of Medicine, SS Medical College and SGM Hospital, Rewa, MP, during October 2014 to September 2015. Total 130 cases were enrolled in study that presented with suspected ADRs during study period, after taking written informed consent. Clinical evaluation and scrutiny of data was done to assess pattern, extent and duration of the suspected adverse drug reactions, affected organ system and involvement of therapeutic drugs classes as a part of the drug reaction.
Results: The result of this study showed that maximum (25%) patients belonged to the 18-25 years of age group, of these 55% was males and 45% were females. Mean (± SD) age of these patients was 34.84 ± 20.99 years. Among the reported suspected ADRs; maximum (26%) were skin rashes, followed by pruritus (15%), nausea, vomiting and rigor each occur 7%; Fever 6%, Apnea, oral ulcers and headache 3%. The most commonly affected organ system was skin and mucous membrane (44%), followed by central nervous system (11%), gastrointestinal system (10%), respiratory system (7%), and cardiovascular system (5%) in decreasing order. Of these; majority of suspected ADRs were associated with use of antimicrobials (68%), followed by NSAIDs (9%); Hematinics (5%); Antihypertensive, Antianginal, Antiepileptics, Hypoglycemis, Corticosteroids and Ionotrops (2%).
Conclusions: The Hospital-based monitoring of suspected ADRs is convenient but it is under reported and the limitation of these studies is that they do not yield the exact incidence of suspected ADRs associated with particular drug use.
Keywords
Drugs, Adverse Drug Reaction, Morbidity, Organ System.References
- RabburRSM, Emmerton L. An introduction to adverse drug reporting system in different countries. Int J Pharm Prac 2005; 13(1):91-100.
- Onder G, Pedone C, Landi F, Cesari M, Della VC and Bernabei R. Adverse Drug Reactions as Cause of Hospital Admissions Results from the Italian Group of Pharmacoepidemiology in the Elderly (GIFA). J Am GeriatrSoc 2002; 50(12):1962-1968.
- Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH and Corey PN. Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients.A Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies. Journal of American medical Association 1998; 279(15):1200-1205.
- Hakkarainen KM, Hedna K, Petzold M, Hagg S. Percentage of patients with preventable adverse drug reactions and preventability of adverse drug reactionsA meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 2012;7 (3): 104-109.
- Alomar M J. Factors affecting the development of adverse drug reactions. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 2014;22:83-94.
- Vallano A, Cereza G, Arnau J M. Obstacles and solutions for spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions in the hospital. Br J Clin Pharmacol. Dec 2005; 60 (6):653-658.
- Gupta R, Sheik A, Strachan D, Anderson HR. Increasing hospital admission for systemic allergies disorders in England: analysis of national admission data. Br Med J 2003;327(7424):1142-1143.
- Chawla S, Kalra BS, Dharmshaktu P, Sahni P. Adverse drug reaction monitoring in a tertiary care teaching hospital. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2011;2(3):196-198.
- Arulmani R, Rajendran SD, Suresh B. Adverse drug reaction monitoring in a secondary care hospital in South India. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007;65(2):210-216.
- Murphy BM and FrigoLC.Development, Implementation and Results of a Successful Multidisciplinary Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Program in a University Teaching Hospital 1993; 28: 1199-1204.
- Jose J, Rao PG. Pattern of adverse drug reaction notified by spontaneous reporting in an Indian tertiary care teaching hospital. Pharmacol Res 2006;54:226-233.
- Glassen DC, Pestotnik SL, Evans RS, Burke JP. Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients. JAMA 1991;266:2847-2851.
- Prosser TR, Kamysz PL. Multidisciplinary adverse drug reaction surveillance programme. Am J Hosp Pharm 1990;47:1334-1339.
- Wester K, Jonnson AK, Spigset O, Druid H, Hagg S. Incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions: a population based study. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol 2007;65(4):573-579.
- Gor AP, Desai SV. Adverse drug reactions (ADR) in the inpatients of medicine department of a rural tertiary care teaching hospital and influence of pharmacovigilance in reporting ADR. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2008;40(1):37-40.
- Vora MB, Trivedi HR, Shah BK, Tripathi CB. Adverse drug reaction in inpatient of internal medicine wards at a tertiary care hospital: a prospective cohort study. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2011;2(1):21-25.
- Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, Lawthers AG, Localio AR, Barnes BA. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med 1991;324(6):377-384.
- Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reaction (CADR): An Overview
Abstract Views :164 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Pharmacology, S.S. Medical College, Rewa, (MP) – 486001, IN
2 Department of Physiology, S.S. Medical College, Rewa, (MP) – 486001, IN
3 Department of Anatomy, Sukh Sagar. Medical College & Hospital, Jabalpur, MP, IN
4 Department of Medicine, S.S. Medical College, Rewa, (MP) – 486001, IN
5 Department of Ayurveda Rewa, (MP) – 486001, IN
1 Department of Pharmacology, S.S. Medical College, Rewa, (MP) – 486001, IN
2 Department of Physiology, S.S. Medical College, Rewa, (MP) – 486001, IN
3 Department of Anatomy, Sukh Sagar. Medical College & Hospital, Jabalpur, MP, IN
4 Department of Medicine, S.S. Medical College, Rewa, (MP) – 486001, IN
5 Department of Ayurveda Rewa, (MP) – 486001, IN
Source
The Indian Practitioner, Vol 70, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 11-15Abstract
Aims and Objectives: Aim of this prospective, hospital based study is to determine the pattern of cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADR). Material and methods: The study was conducted in the department of Pharmacology and department of Medicine, at SS Medical College and associated SGM Hospital, Rewa, MP from Oct 2014 to Sept 2015; total 130 cases were enrolled with suspected ADRs. Results: In this study maximum (25%) patients belonged to 18-25 years of age group. Mean (± SD) age of these patients was 34.84 ± 20.99 years. The skin and mucous membrane are most commonly (52.29%) affected organ system with suspected ADRs followed by central nervous system (9.19%) and gastrointestinal system (8.62%). Among the cutaneous ADRs; 51.64% were skin rashes followed by 29.67% pruritus, 5.49% oral ulcers, 3.29% Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), 2.19% bullous eruption, 2.19% lips swelling, 2.19% toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), 1.09% oral candidiasis, 1.09% red man syndrome and 1.09% hair changes. Of these ADRs; 82.41%were associated with use of antimicrobials followed by 14.28% NSAIDs. Amongst AMAs 20.97% ADRs were associated with fluoroquinolones, 18.68% with cephalosporin, 10.98% with penicillin and 5.49% with sulphonamide. Conclusions: In this study, skin and mucous membrane is most commonly (52.29%) affected organ system; skin rashes and pruritus are the most common cutaneous ADRs and majority of cases were associated with use of fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins AMAs.Keywords
Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions (CADR), Exanthematous Drug Eruptions, Antimicrobial Agents (AMAs), Fluoroquinolones.References
- Edward IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reaction: definition, diagnosis and management. Lancet 2000; 356 (9237): 1255-1259.
- Rabbur RSM, Emmerton L. An introduction to adverse drug reporting system in different countries. Int J Pharm Prac 2005; 13 (1): 91-100.
- Rao PGM, Archana B, Jose J. Implementation and result of adverse drug reaction reporting program at an Indian teaching hospital. Indian J Pharmacol2006; 38 (4): 293-4.
- Brown SD and Landry FJ. Recognizing Reporting and Reducing Adverse Drug Reactions. Southern Medical Journal 2001; 94: 370-372.
- Padmaja U, Adhikari P, Pereira P. A prospective analysis of adverse drug reaction in a south Indian hospital. Online J Health Allied Sci. 2009; 8 (3): 12.
- David WB, Nathan S, David JC. Elisabeth B, Nan L, Laura A and Petersen. The Cost of Adverse Drug Events in Hospitalized Patients. Journal of American Medical Association. 1997; 277 (4): 307-311.
- Bordet S, Gautier H, Lelouet B and Dupuis J. Caron. Analysis of the Direct Cost of Adverse Drug Reaction in Hospitalised Patients. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2001; 56: 935-39.
- Arulmani R, Rajendran SD, Suresh B. Adverse drug reaction monitoring in a secondary care hospital in South India. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 65 (2): 210-216.
- Murphy BM, Frigo LC. Development, implementation and results of a successful multidisciplinary adverse drug reactions reporting program in a university teaching hospital. Hosp Pharm 1993; 28: 1199-1204.
- Jose J, Rao PG. Pattern of adverse drug reaction notified by spontaneous reporting in a Indian tertiary care teaching hospital. Pharmacol Res 2006; 54: 226-233.
- Glassen DC, Pestotnik SL, Evans RS, Burke JP. Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients. JAMA 1991; 266: 2847-2851.
- Prosser TR, Kamysz PL. Multidisciplinary adverse drug reaction surveillance programme. Am J Hosp Pharm 1990; 47: 1334-1339.
- Surajit Nayak and Basanti Acharjya. Adverse cutaneous drug reaction. Indian J Dermatol. 2008; 53 (1): 2–8.
- DeShazo RD, Kemp SF. Allergic reactions to drugs and biologic agents. JAMA. 1997; 278: 1895–906.
- 3. Anderson JA, Adkinson NF. Allergic reactions to drugs and biologic agents. JAMA. 1987; 258: 2891–9.
- Roujeau JC, Stern RS. Severe adverse cutaneous reactions to drugs. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1272-1285.
- Sharma VK, Sethuraman G. Adverse cutaneous reactions to drugs: An overview. J Postgrad Med 1996; 42: 15-22.
- Gupta R, Sheik A, Strachan D, Anderson HR. Increasing hospital admission for systemic allergies disorders in England: analysis of national admission data. Br Med J 2003; 327 (7424): 1142-1143.
- Chawla S, Kalra BS, Dharmshaktu P, Sahni P. Adverse drug reaction monitoring in a tertiary care teaching hospital. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2011; 2 (3): 196-198.
- Gruchalla R. Understanding drug allergies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000; 105: 637–44.
- Chatterjee S, Ghosh AP, Barbhuiya J, Dey SK. Adverse cutaneous drug reactions: A one year survey at a dermatology outpatient clinic of a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Pharmacol. 2006; 38: 429–31.
- Stern RS, Wintroub BU. Cutaneous reactions to drugs. In: Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, Austen KF, Goldsmith LA, Katz SI, editors. Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology in general medicine. 5th ed. McGraw-Hill: New York; 1999. pp. 1634–42.
- Sullivan JR, Shear NH. Drug eruptions and other adverse drug effects in aged skin. Clin Geriatr Med. 2002; 18: 21–42.
- Kauppinen K, Stubb S. Drug eruptions: Causative agents and clinical types. Acta Derm Venereol. 1984; 64: 320–4.
- Pudukadan D, Thappa DM. Adverse cutaneous drug reactions: Clinical pattern and causative agents in a tertiary care center in South India. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2004; 70: 20–4.
- Ajayi FO, Sun H, Perry J. Adverse drug reactions: A review of relevant factors. J Clin Pharmacol. 2000; 40: 1093–101.
- Wester K, Jonnson AK, Spigset O, Druid H, Hagg S. Incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions: a population based study. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol 2007; 65 (4): 573-579.
- Gor AP, Desai SV. Adverse drug reactions (ADR) in the inpatients of medicine department of a rural tertiary care teaching hospital and influence of pharmacovigilance in reporting ADR. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2008; 40 (1): 37-40.
- Vora MB, Trivedi HR, Shah BK, Tripathi CB. Adverse drug reaction in inpatient of internal medicine wards at a tertiary care hospital: a prospective cohort study. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2011; 2 (1): 21-25.
- Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, Lawthers AG, Localio AR, Barnes BA. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med 1991; 324 (6):377-384.
- V K Sharma, G Sethuraman, B Kumar. Cutaneous adverse drug reactions: clinical pattern and causative agents--a 6 year series from Chandigarh, India. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 2001; 47 (2): 95-99
- F. Fiszenson-Albala, V. Auzerie,E. Mahe, R. Farinotti,C. Durand-Stocco, B. Crickx, V. Descamps. A 6-month prospective survey of cutaneous drug reactions in a hospital setting. British Journal of Dermatology 2003; 149, (5): 1018–1022